🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has stated to have harvested a vast number of songs from Spotify and is preparing to release them online.

Potential Impetus for AI Training

Industry experts noted the apparent data breach could aid AI companies looking for material to train their technology.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million entries of associated data such as performer and album names. The company, which carries more than 100 million tracks, stated that the leak did not represent its entire inventory.

“We have located and disabled the malicious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” said a Spotify representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorized access found a third party collected public metadata and used illicit methods to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Stated Mission and Worries

Spotify does not think the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They asserted the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a method of exchanging large data files online.

“Naturally Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s information and heritage”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Debate

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ rights, said the leaked music would probably be used for training AI models.

“Training on pirated material is sadly common in the AI industry, so this accessed music is almost certain to be used training AI models,” he stated.

The group's website alludes to a large online archive, a vast online repository of copyrighted books that has reportedly been leveraged by Meta to develop its AI models.

A founder of an AI startup posted on the professional network that individuals of the public could in theory “create their own private free equivalent of Spotify”. He added it could also enable tech companies to “train on contemporary music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a key issue between creatives, authors and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Proposals and Reactions

Across Britain, artists and writers have protested against a government suggestion to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without consent unless the owner opts out. Virtually every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has supported artists’ concerns.

A government minister for science, innovation and technology told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.